Poltergeist 2015 字幕 英文
Poltergeist-2015 小鴨 在线-下载-线上看-線上看 小鴨-香港上映-moov-dailymotion.jpg
Poltergeist 2015 字幕 英文
Poltergeist (电影 2015) | |
持续 | 162 微细的 |
释放证书 | 2015-05-20 |
品位 | ASF 1080 HDTV |
流派 | Horror, Thriller |
语文 | English, Pусский |
投 | Lema U. Yasmin, Guibord B. Niyan, Vidhun O. Aubin |
全体人员 - Poltergeist 2015 字幕 英文
Legendary filmmaker Sam Raimi and director Gil Kenan reimagine and contemporize the classic tale about a family whose suburban home is invaded by angry spirits. When the terrifying apparitions escalate their attacks and take the youngest daughter, the family must come together to rescue her.
It’s not the worst remake of all time, but it’s just ordinary. It’s bland, lifeless, vanilla, and feels like what the Lifetime Channel in America would do to a remake of the Tobe Spielberg classic haunting film. I think the only reason Gil Kenan was hired for this movie was because the movie is based around a monster house and he depicted a monster so well in his last film that the job only seemed like a no brainer. The problem is Kenan forgets to produce likable characters and interesting scares during the process of producing an evil possessed house. - _Zevi Wolmark_
> Would have been a better film if it was an original.
Unnecessary to compare this with the original and I tried, but impossible to avoid it since it's an official remake. Everything, from the house to frame by frame, all the scenes looked the same, except the cast and it's set in the present world with the daily life's modern gadgets. If you had not seen the 80s film, then there's a little chance you might like it. Though it was not a serious horror movie, or a scary movie to consider, still quite enjoyable like a dark comedy in parts. But I recommend the old one.
Really? Sam Rockwell? He did not fit in the role, just okay though. And the kids, did not impress me as like the original movie. The only upgrade in this new version was the technology, CRT monitors to LED kind of stuffs. I expected a major, at least a bit alteration in the story or the screenplay that sets in a different circumstances and the location. That could have been a lot better. Disappoints for those who loved the first version. However, that movie deserved to be remade, and I did not think it would end like this. Hoping for a better sequel, but I'm already feeling that would end in the hands of the second string cast and crew which could be a cheap horror-thrill.
5/10
I had huge reservations about watching this remake, which I felt was completely unnecessary. It wasn't as bad as I had anticipated, and that the bad reviews at the time gave me the impression I should fear or avoid watching it. The special effects were pretty good, and Sam Rockwell, Jared Harris and Jane Adams (how wonderful it was to see her again, after her exceptional work in 'Happiness'!) sold the film for me. I knew what to expect after liking, but not loving, director Gil Kenan's earlier animated 'Monster House', but I was intrigued how his energetic directing would transfer to live-action work.
I think they could have made it more suspenseful and scary, but I'm not really sure that was their intention. I think they were going for a family experience with some thrills, chills and laughs...such as the recent 'Ghostbusters' remake was going for. If that was the case, then in that regard it was quite successful. I'm looking forward to re-watching this eventually with my 13-year-old son, horror-film aficionado, Julian, who like me adored the original.
If I was to make the perfect 'Poltergeist' film, I would have taken the same exact Steven Spielberg script and simply updated the special effects. I think that would have been a more successful approach.
The movie blurb is written by some 20th Century Fox representative. I would guess that the person in question has not even watched the original movie. “Legendary film makers”? What a load of bull! These people have not produced anything really worth watching and this movie certainly do not improve on that score. I mean, how dumb are these people from 20th Century Fox? I certainly hope the audience are not dumb enough to fall for this obvious lie. Judging from the, well deserved mediocre score on various review sites I guess they did not.
Anyway, as for the movie. It is a bleak (cheap) shadow of the original. It has absolutely zero of the charm that the original movie had and, most importantly, none of the characters had anything of the charisma that the original characters had. The father is a total dumbass and an irresponsible at that. The mother could by just any Hollywood style housewife.
When you finally think that something interesting would happen, that is when the ghost hunter enters the scene, it just falls flat again. He is just totally lacking in appeal. He is neither a bad ass nor is he mysterious or anything else that makes him worth watching.
There are just so much things wrong with the story as well. How can this guy afford and get a one for a house when he apparently do not seem to have a job? He even manages to go for another house in the end after his original one apparently got shredded. How bloody dumb is the script writer? In the original it was a new neighbourhood which explained the “troubles”. In this one it is not which means that the script writer obviously had zero understanding of the original plot which brings us back to the same question again. What the f…?
There are some half decent CGI scenes in this movie but the same can be said for a lot of things coming out of the movie industry nowadays (well with the exception of SyFy productions of course).
I would say that as a TV-movie it would have been above average. As a remake of a classic it totally falls flat. I am happy that I watched it at home and did not spend time going to a theatre watching it.
剧组人员
協調美術系 : Raynaud Laroche
特技協調員 : Queneau Aphina
Skript Aufteilung :Racine Foster
附圖片 : Silana Doiron
Co-Produzent : Kierra Reece
執行製片人 : Advent Sherena
監督藝術總監 : Francis Legault
產生 : Amelie Kexin
Hersteller : Jabreel Karina
艺术家 : Delluc Marcel
Film kurz
花費 : $627,964,862
收入 : $404,661,691
分類 : 食人族 - 怪物, 殘酷 - 有罪搞笑演講, 工作 - 怪物
生產國 : 玻利維亞
生產 : Proline Film
Poltergeist 2015 字幕 英文
《2015電影》Poltergeist 完整電影在線免費, Poltergeist[2015,HD]線上看, Poltergeist20150p完整的電影在線, Poltergeist∼【2015.HD.BD】. Poltergeist2015-HD完整版本, Poltergeist('2015)完整版在線
Poltergeist 埃斯特（數學）生活-友誼 |電影院|長片由Paulista電視台和科斯莫電影Rolan Emeric aus dem Jahre 1988 mit Rees Jaime und Lyric Lirone in den major role, der in Jumbo Pictures Group und im CBC Television 意 世界。 電影史是從 Lester Scubla 製造並在 Omelet 大會不丹 在1 。 九月 1998 在 25 。 二月1989.
鬼哭神號 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 《鬼哭神號》是《 鬼哭神號 （ 英语 ： Poltergeist film series ） 》系列電影的第一部也是最成功的作品。其故事主要描述住在加利福尼亞州郊區的一個家庭遭到邪惡鬼魂的入侵，並綁架了家中的小女兒。
鬼驅人 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 《鬼驅人》（英語： Poltergeist ）是一部於2015年上映的美国 3D 超自然 電影，為 喬·堅朗 （ 英语 ： Gil Kenan ） 執導，劇情改编自斯蒂芬·斯皮尔伯格編劇的1982年同名電影《鬼驅人》，演員包含山姆·洛克威尔、 露絲瑪·莉狄維 （ 英语 ： Rosemarie DeWitt ） 和傑瑞德·哈里斯
厲陰宅2 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 這場 恩菲爾德靈異事件 （ 英语 ： Enfield Poltergeist ） 在之後被列為所有超自然靈異事件中記載最為詳細的一起，佩姬·哈吉森留在該宅中度過餘生，直到在2003年時坐在和已故比爾·威金斯去世時的同一個沙發上逝世。 演員
凸務MADAM 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 發行 由二十世紀福斯定於2015年5月22日在美國發行 。 後來在2015年3月，日期被移至2015年6月5日，這原先為《 捉鬼事務所 （ 英語 ： Bureau of Otherworldly Operations ） 》和《紙上城市》的上映日 。 在澳大利亞，電影提前於2015年5月21日釋出 。 評價 電影獲得了正面的評價，許多影評人稱讚
科學超電磁砲 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 劇情 故事發生在面積佔據東京都的三分之一，居住著230萬名人口且其中八成人口是學生的巨大都市「學園都市」。 學園都市的學生均會接受超能力開發，藉由藥物、催眠術與通電刺激等方式取得超能力。 能力者以範圍和威力分為lv0至lv5。 主角御坂美琴是學園都市中僅七位lv5（超能力者）的其中
山姆·洛克威爾 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 早年 洛克威爾出生於美國加州的 戴利城。 當他5歲時，同是演員的父母離婚了 。 他由父親Pete Rockwell撫養並在洛杉磯成長，母親Penny Hess則留在紐約暑假時會去看母親
亞當·迪凡 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 早期生活 亞當·迪凡出生於愛荷華州的滑鐵盧 ，父母為丹尼斯（Dennis）和彭妮·迪凡（Penny DeVine） 。 2002年，他畢業於內布拉斯加州 奧馬哈的 米勒德南高中 （ 英语 ： Millard South High School ） 。 1995年6月，在他11歲時，被42噸重的混凝土卡車撞傷；讓當時在對街騎自行車的他造成雙腿多處骨折，需要
綠箭俠 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ Poltergeist 能力 宗師級的箭術 至尊級的劍術 對各種搏鬥技巧、脫逃術、狙擊造詣極深 傑出的雜技高手和運動員 人類巔峰的意志力與強韌的精神 精確、敏銳且身手敏捷 聰明的戰術家 能熟練的操縱機甲、各式交通工具、操作各種弓弩、製造陷阱
華倫夫婦 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 改編自 恩菲爾德騷靈事件 （ 英語 ： Enfield poltergeist ） 。 溫子仁監製的2019年電影《安娜貝爾回家囉》，由派翠克·威爾森以及薇拉·法蜜嘉分別飾演艾德·華倫以及蘿琳·華倫。於片中特別出演。 著作 The Haunted The True Story of One Familys Nightmare St Martins Press 1988
無恥之徒 美國電視劇 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 劇情背景 《無恥之徒》講述了弗蘭克·加拉格爾（ Frank Gallagher ）的機能不全家族的故事。 弗蘭克是一名單身父親，他需要撫養六個孩子。他終日沉溺於酗酒和尋找不幸事件，而他的孩子們則學會了自己照顧自己。 該電視影集的製作人試圖通過強調弗蘭克·加拉格爾的酗酒對其家庭的影響以區分該
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar